Report of the Working Group on

 

RETENTION

 

 

Members

 

Eli Peña, Director Advising Center (Chair)

Hilda Silva, Interim Vice President for Student Affairs

Jay Phillips, Dean of General & Developmental Education

Ruth Ann Ragland, Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs

Jesus Galvan, Chair, Industrial Technology

Kathy Dougherty, Director, BSN Completion Program

Eldon Nelson, Dean, School of Health Sciences

Dianna Blankenship, Assistant Professor, Business Technology

Deloria Nanze-Davis, Assoc.  Professor and Chair, Dept. of Math.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Report of the Task Force on Enrollment Planning

 

Working Group on Retention

 

Introduction

 

A set of educational objectives flow from the mission established by the partnership of The University of Texas at Brownsville and Texas Southmost College (UTB/TSC).  Mission objectives include: promoting the personal growth of students; providing a setting in which students will be able to enrich and expand their knowledge, and refine their skills, understanding, and values; broaden and deepen students' understanding of themselves and of the society in which they live; and encourage students to develop their own sense of values, allowing them to become more mature and self-directed individuals who will be responsible participants in local and global communities.

 

The success of an institution and the success of its students are inseparable.  Student persistence to completion of educational goals is a key indicator of student satisfaction and success. Persistence is an individual performance indicator, whereas retention is an institutional performance indicator, which reflects the objectives of the mission of this institution.

 

This report profiles UTB/TSC retention data, strengths, and weaknesses.  It also provides recommendations for reinforcing current retention efforts and establishing additional ones designed to have short-term and long-term positive impacts for students.

 

UTB/TSC PROFILE-RETENTION DATA

           

Freshman to sophomore persistence rates and graduation rates are the most common indicators of retention.  The freshman to sophomore retention rate identifies the percentage of students who persist through the freshman year to the beginning of the sophomore year.  This transition is important if a student is to get a college degree.  Freshman retention rates for UTB/TSC freshman cohorts from Fall 1992 to Fall 1999 indicate rates from 55 % to 62 % as shown in TABLE 2.

 

Freshman Retention Rates

                TABLE 2           Fall 1992 to Fall 1999 Entering Classes

     Cohort Class

     First To Second

         Semester

    Retention Rate

                First To Second

                        Year

                Retention Rate

           1992

              NA

NA

           1993

              NA

NA

           1994

            79.6 %

57.7 %

           1995

            82.4 %

59.2 %

           1996

            80.2 %

57.7 %

           1997

            85.1 %

56.2 %

           1998

            86.0 %

62.3 %

           1999

              NA                            

NA

Source:      The UTB/TSC Retention Plan, Steingass, 2000.

                   

 

The University of Texas at Brownsville and Texas Southmost College data are also reported indicating percentages of entering freshmen students who attained certificate, associate, and bachelor degrees. 

 

 

TABLE 3          Certificate, Associates, & Bachelor Degree Attainment

 

1992 Entering Cohort

 

Certificate Attainment………………..2 % by May 1994 (2 years)

Associate Degree Attainment………...3 % by May 1995 (3 years)

Bachelor Degree Attainment…………7 % by May 1998 (6 years)

 

1993 Entering Cohort

 

Certificate Attainment……………….2 % by May 1995 (2 years)

Associate Degree Attainment………..2 % by May 1996 (3 years)

Bachelor Degree Attainment………...8 % by May 1999 (6 years)

 

1994 Entering Cohort

 

Certificate Attainment……………….3 % by May 1996 (2 years)

Associate Degree Attainment………..2 % by May 1997 (3 years)

Bachelor Degree Attainment………...5 % by May 2000 (6 years)

 

It should be noted that these graduation rates do not consider students' educational goals.  Some students entering UTB/TSC are only considering a certificate program of study as their educational goal.  In fact, some students in certificate programs of study only completed program courses and did not apply for graduation.  Other students in certificate programs of study may not have applied for graduation for the certificate and may have just continued in the program's associate degree requirements. 

 

Data on degree attainment should be looked at with greater detail to account for students' educational goals, degree versus non-degree seeking students, students' intentions to transfer after completing basic requirements, and other factors affecting certificate and degree attainment.

 

 

RETENTION STRENGTHS

 

  1. Both UTB/TSC and national data are available documenting reasons why students withdraw voluntarily (UTB/TSC Retention Report, Steingass, Fall 2000)

 

Reference:        Levitz, R., Noel, L., Richter, B. "Strategic Moves for Retention

                                    Success." In Gaither, G. H. (ed.), Promising Practices in

                                    Recruitment, Remediation, and Retention.  San Francisco:

                                    Jossey - Bass Publishers, 1999.

 

Our data indicate that many students depart from UTB/TSC voluntarily despite adequate academic performance.  In fact, such withdrawals include individuals whose grade point averages often exceed those of the average persister. 

 

Students who drop out voluntarily do so for a number of reasons.  Data are regularly collected in an exit interview to identify students' reasons for withdrawing from the institution during the semester.  According to the data compiled over the past three semesters, the following are the most common reasons cited by students for dropping out of UTB/TSC before completing the semester.

 

 

  1. Data has been collected describing the characteristics of UTB/TSC students who voluntarily withdraw.  (UTB/TSC Retention Report, Steingass, Fall 2000)

 

Extensive data on the characteristics of students who persisted versus those who dropped out were examined.  Data from the one-year retention/attrition rates of the first-time fall 1998 freshmen cohort were analyzed and we found that:

 

 

  1. Campus data are available prioritizing potential barriers that may prevent students from returning.  (UTB/TSC Retention Report, Steingass, Fall 2000)

 

During the Spring 2000 semester, all students enrolled in lower-division classes were surveyed regarding their registration plans for Fall 2000.  The data provide information about potential barriers that may prevent students from re-enrolling in the Fall semester.  Almost 2,300 surveys were analyzed, and 90% of the students indicated that they would return in the Fall semester.  However, of the students who had plans to re-enroll in the Fall 2000 semester, several barriers were indicated as possibly preventing them from doing so.  The following table summarizes these potential threats to persistence.

 

 

Potential Barriers That May Prevent Students

From Returning During Fall 2000 Semester

(N = 2,294)

TABLE 4

                          BARRIER

              N

      PERCENT

Financial difficulties

            889

            38.8

Problems with financial aid

            557

            24.3

Job conflicts

            327

            14.3

Problems passing TASP

            245

            10.7

Family obligations

            239

            10.4

Transferring to another college

            156

              6.8

Moving out of Brownsville area

            125

              5.4

Transportation problems

            107

              4.7

Academic difficulties

            104

              4.5

Unsure about major or career goals

            104

              4.5   

Daycare problems

              82

              3.6

 

 

  1. Campus data  are available that identify ways students say the institution (UTB/TSC) could help them in continuing.  (UTB/TSC Retention Report, Steingass, Fall 2000)

 

Students were asked to identify ways in which the institution could help them to continue with their education.  The top six ways identified by students (in descending order of frequency) included:

 

 

 

In addition, a senior-level student survey conducted in the Fall of 1999 indicated that the following factors (in descending order of frequency) are perceived as influential toward success in college.  The factors most frequently mentioned included:

 


-mentoring and support from faculty

-self-determination and motivation

-well-defined goal orientation

-good study skills

-adequate levels of financial aid


 

  1. A number of retention efforts are currently in place at UTB/TSC.  Our review of these efforts include the following inventory.

 

System-wide K-16 Initiative

 

Intervention Programs

Upward Bound

Talent Search

South Texas Engineers Math and Science

 

Grants

 

Additional efforts

 

 

RETENTION CONCERNS

 

The following areas pertaining to UTB/TSC’s retention efforts were identified as needing improvement.

 

  1. Retention on the UTB/TSC campus needs to be defined in terms of student persistence, completion rates and by the levels of certificate and/or degree attainment.

 

[See Recommendation # 2 Institutional Issues – Operations]

 

  1. Retention efforts across campus must be coordinated, followed thru and evaluated.

 

[See Recommendations # 1, # 3, # 4, # 5, # 6, Institutional Issues – Operations]

 

  1. Campus retention efforts must include an organized plan with follow-up and evaluation that addresses the following:

 

·        Student customer service areas:

(1)   Enrollment Services offices

(2)   Campus-wide offices and services

·        Developmental education

·        Publications (e.g., catalog, course schedules, etc.)

·        Financial aid

·        Recruitment

·        Academic programs and course offerings

·        Student services addressing satisfaction toward social, personal, health related, and academic issues in students' adjustments to college

 

[See Recommendations  # 4 Institutional Issues - Operations

                                                              # 1, # 2, # 3; Institutional Issues - Publications

                                                              # 1 Academic Issues - Under-prepared Students

                                                              # 1 Life Issues - Financial Aid

                                                              # 1 Life Issues - Health Problems

                                                              # 1 Social/Personal Issues - Student Acculturation

     to Campus]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

 

Getting students started on the right path in college through to graduation begins with anticipating and meeting their transitional and adjustment needs when they enter.  Intrusive, proactive strategies are necessary to reach freshmen before they have an opportunity to experience feelings of failure, disappointment, and confusion.

 

In surveys of UTB/TSC withdrawing students money, time, and personal issues are frequently given as reasons of why they leave college.  Levitz and Hovland (1998) have identified types of issues facing students that ultimately have an impact on their decision to drop out.  The categories include institutional, academic, life, social, and personal issues.

 

The working group’s opinion is that these categories fit the experience of UTB/TSC students; therefore, our recommendations for improving retention efforts at UTB/TSC are presented in this report in the context of these five categories.

 

I.  Institutional Issues - Operations

 

1.  Define retention for the UTB/TSC partnership

 

2.  Develop a campus wide retention plan and connect it to UTB/TSC’s strategic plan, and the budgeting process.

 

3.  Establish a permanent Retention Task Force Committee.

 

This committee will:

 

4.  Establish the Office of Student Retention Services

 

The Office of Student Retention Services would be the primary retention center at UTB/TSC and report to the Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs.  Establishing an Office of Student Retention Services will focus retention efforts on students' satisfaction with retention services and their social, personal, and academic adjustment to college.  Examples of retention services which need to be assessed include:

 

5.  Hire a Director for Student Retention Services

 

The Director of Student Retention Services would be responsible for implementing and evaluating retention efforts and serving as an advocate to all undergraduate students, especially freshmen.

 

6.  Establish a Student Courtesy Information Center

 

This center would provide readily accessible information for students regarding all campus services, especially frontline offices (Admissions, Academic Advising, Business, Financial Aid, New Students Relations, Registrar, and Testing) and other offices across campus.

 

 

II.  Institutional Issues - Academic Advising

 

Revise academic advising to include retention efforts that assist students to establish greater connections with the institution.

 

            Academic advising should be revised to achieve the following:

·        Link developmental advising to students' needs for success in vocational-technical and academic programs of study

·        Link academic advising with orientation of new students

·        Define academic advising expectations for staff and faculty for workload documentation and seek recognition for academic advising caseloads

·        Strengthen academic advising in specialty areas (pre-med, pre-law, etc.)

·        Provide advising toward addressing students' course loads and job and school conflicts (also addressed by proposed Office of Student Retention Services)

·        Hire staff to maintain up-to-date degree audit operations to function with current programs of study and changes in curriculum, graduation check, catalog updates, course pre-requisites, and transcript evaluations

·        Establish on-going faculty development for academic advising issues

 

 

 

III. Institutional Issues - Classroom Teaching

 

Establish an organized campus-wide plan that documents classroom instructional strategies aimed at improving retention and includes follow-up, evaluation, and faculty development components.

 

 

IV. Institutional Issues - Publications

 

1. Establish campus-wide procedures that produce a student course schedule with minimal error and on a timely basis.

 

 

2. Establish campus-wide procedures that produce yearly catalogs (undergraduate and graduate) on a timely basis and with accurate information relating to programs of study offered, changes in curriculum and courses, course pre-requisites, and general student information.

 

Activities:

 

3. Establish campus-wide procedures to guide the uniform development of publications that can be used for recruitment purposes and inform students of departmental programs of study.

 

 

V.  Institutional Issues - Classroom Setting and Facilities

 

Establish a systematic review of classrooms as they relate to students and curricular needs.

 

Activities:

 

 

VI.  Academic Issues - Under-Prepared Students

 

Establish a developmental studies plan for under-prepared students.

 

Activities:

 

 

VII.   Life Issues - Financial Circumstances

  

  Establish a financial aid retention plan.

 

Activities:

 

 

VIII.  Life Issues - Health Problems

 

Establish an institutional health care plan that informs students of the availability of health care services on campus, health care education, and health care referrals.

 

Activities:

 

 

 

IX.  Social Issues - Student Acculturation to Campus

 

Incorporate into campus-wide retention efforts and/or plans greater efforts to acculturate students into campus life.

 

Activities: