Report of the Working Group on

 

CUSTOMER SERVICE

 

 

Members

 

Hector Castillo, Chair,  Executive Assistant to the President (Chair)

Karen Stowe, Associate Director of Testing Office, Chair of Staff Senate

Amanda Fuhro, Director of Human Resources

Al Barreda, Dean, Enrollment Management

Diamantina Freeberg, Associate Professor, Behavioral Sciences

Doug Ferrier, Director, Information Services

Jerry Miller, Associate Vice President for Business Affairs

Farhat Iftekharuddin, Dean, College of Liberal Arts

Carol Collinsworth, Assistant Professor, Accounting

Vincent Solis, Director, Student Activities

Roy Martinez, Maintenance Worker II, Physical Plant

Aglhaen Nieto-Cruz, Program Coordinator, Upward Bound

 

 

 


Report of the Task Force on Enrollment Planning

 

Working Group on Customer Service

 

Introduction

 

The Working Group on Customer Service was charged with identifying strengths and needs and with developing recommendations for improvement of customer service on our campus.  The committee undertook the charge by first surveying students and staff regarding their perceptions of UTB/TSC’s customer service strengths and needs.  A list was compiled and the committee then focused on possible solutions for the areas identified as needing improvement.  In this report, the term student and customer are used interchangeably.  We recognize that the customer is anyone requiring service of our institution.  The customer could be students, staff, or the community at large.

 

Overall Strengths

 

Although many individual departments were specifically identified as either lacking or having excellent customer service, these observations pertain to the entire institution. Among the customer service strengths that were identified are the following:

 

 

 

 

 

Overall Needs 

 

The following needs areas related to customer service were identified during our study:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recommendations

 

Six major categories emerged for organizing our customer service recommendations as solutions were being proposed.  These six categories were training, information, technology, accessibility, resources and assessment. Recommendations were developed under each category to improve customer service. The committee recognizes that some of the recommendations may overlap with those of other Working Groups but we believe that this overlap only serves to reinforce the need to focus on those particular areas.

 

1.  TRAINING

 

Effective customer service is no accident. It is achieved by preparing employees to handle the challenges of the job and encouraging them to take advantage of opportunities as they arise. The committee discussed the importance of training and our recommendations are:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.  INFORMATION

 

The Customer Service Working Group feels that proper dissemination of information is a proactive approach to customer service recruitment and retention of students.  Moreover, timely dissemination of information aids in preparing students and their families for their journey into higher education.  As the committee studied many possibilities for the dissemination of information, the following recommendations were proposed:

 

On Campus

 

 

 

 

 

 

Off Campus

 

 

·        Communicate with high school graduating seniors about considering UTB/TSC as an option.

 

·        Expand recruitment to include malls, churches and community centers.

 

 

 

 

3.  TECHNOLOGY

 

The use of technology and its various applications in higher education change rapidly.  The committee believes strongly that we must take advantage of these innovations and technological applications to enhance customer service.  Our recommendations in this area are:

 

·        Expand the use of electronic message systems to allow for quicker notices to students.  This form of communication will provide our students with quick and easy information.  The university community can receive information updates, information on upcoming events, and numerous other initiatives that students need to know.  One example of this would be an on-line database of e-mails.  This type of service would allow two-way communications as students list their own personal e-mail as oppose to what we provide them. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.  ACCESSIBILITY

 

Accessibility to our services and programs must be a cornerstone of the planning process.  In order to insure that students have easy entry and access to all of our services and programs we recommend the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.  RESOURCES

 

Linking planning and budgeting is fundamental to the success of any initiative.  A plan focuses on specific desired goals and outcomes.  The budget provides the needed resources to implement the necessary directives in order to achieve the goals.  A successful customer service initiative will require some resources but it does not or should not depend on additional resources for implementation.  The committee recommends the following pertaining to resources:

 

·        Employees need to receive professional development enabling them to carry out the initiatives.  This often requires time away from their position.  Adequate resources are needed to provide for replacement personnel while this training is taking place. 

 

 

 

 

 

6.  ASSESSMENT

 

The university should conduct research to measure the effectiveness of the services being provided to students and to the general public.  The gathering of data can be accomplished by mail, phone, or on the Web.  The Institutional Effectiveness Committee or Legacy committee should review and evaluate all findings and report annually to The Executive Council.  Information gathering methods should be targeted for all of our varied customers including the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

Customer service should be a core value of the institution.  It should be emphasized at all levels and continually reinforced.  UTB/TSC should serve as a model for customer service and a catalyst in the community to embrace this philosophy.