The
Academic Senate
Minutes
I. Call to Order
Ms. Cantu called the
Members of the Senate in attendance included: Dr. Betsy Boze, Ms. Ethel Cantu (*), Mr. Roberto Cortina (s), Dr. Charles Dameron, Dr. Therese Gallegos (s), Dr. Gerald Hollier (s), Dr. Charles Lackey, Ms. Julie Larson (*), Dr. Jose Martin, Mr. Domingo Molina (s), Dr. Rafael Otero (s), Mr. Jay Phillips, Mr. Mahandran Rajasuriar (s), Dr. Ruth Ann Ragland, Dr. Renee Rubin (s), Dr. Hilda Silva, Dr. Carl Stockton, Ms. Thelma Sullivan (s), Dr. John Sutterby (s), and Mr. Tom Welther (s).
Visitors included: Dr. David Pearson and Dr. Rey Ramirez.
II. Review and Approve of the Minutes
Ms. Cantu called for review of the minutes from the
Hearing no further corrections or additions, the minutes stood approved as corrected.
III. Presentation/Discussion: Tuition and Fee
Increases
Dr. Hilda Silva, VPSA, provided the Senate with an update on tuition and fee increases. The following is a summary of her presentation.
Designated Tuition would increase from $38.00 per semester credit hour to $44.00 per semester credit hour. This increase would be used to hire additional faculty and staff and to establish a student employment fund.
Graduate Tuition Differential would increase $5.00 for graduate students for a tuition differential of $19.00. This increase would be used to defray costs associated with higher costs of providing graduate courses and to fund graduate/research assistants.
International Education Fee is a proposed new fee of $2.00 which would be charged to every student per semester. This fee would be used to provide funds for students wanting to participate in exchange and/or study-abroad programs.
Medical Services Fee is
a proposed new fee of $20.00 per long semester and pro-rated to $10.00 for each
summer session, regardless of length.
This medical services fee would be used to expand services offered to
students at the
services include mental health care and counseling, dental services, X-ray services, third party insurance billing, satellite clinic at ITEC, and health education and promotion.
Student Recreation
Fee is a fee approved on
Dr. Silva pointed out that the fees listed above are compulsory fees-all students pay them and noted the following changes in incidental fees.
SPED Assessment Instrument Fee is a proposed new $25.00 fee for graduate students enrolled in SPED 6301, SPED 6302, SPED 6303, SPED 6307, SPED 6309, SPED 6600 and ESPY 6315. This fee is to be charged per course and will be used to defray costs associated with updating and replacing assessment instruments, which are used in the majority of courses to complete the masters program for educational diagnosticians.
Outdoor Education Course Fee is a proposed new $20.00 fee for students enrolled in KINEU 2304. This fee would be used to defray coats for fee(s) associated with ropes/ adventure activities and to replace equipment.
Developmental Writing Fee is a proposed new fee of $10.00 per semester for students enrolled in ENGL 0320 and ENGL 0321. This fee would be used to defray the cost of operating computer classrooms, including salaries, equipment, and supplies.
Following a discussion, Ms. Cantu thanked Dr. Silva for her presentation.
IV. Senate President’s Report
Ms. Cantu had five items in her report.
V. Faculty Advisory Council Report/
THECB Report: Doctoral Education
In
Ms. Cantu reported on the Faculty Advisory Council meeting
held in
Teresa Sullivan, Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs
Regarding the Coordinating Board’s report on doctoral
education, Sullivan commented that “you can have more if you have one, but if
you have none, then it will be difficult.”
The Coordinating Board did create a Graduate Advisory Policy Committee
that will have representatives from higher education institutions in
Kenneth Shine, Executive Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs
Shine commented that time and effort reporting on federally
funded grants is critical and that small campuses are especially
vulnerable. He recommended that
institutions have a vice president for research. He also discussed the critical nursing
shortage and a clash with the Coordinating Board over ADN programs. His view is that most ADN nurses are “not
well trained”. He highlighted the
collaborations in south
FAC Chair James Bartlett
The retirement contribution to ORP can be 8.5%. The Campus Life Committee of the Board of Regents chaired by Kraven, for the first time will have a representative from FAC. The FAC Executive Committee will present these four topics at the February 2005 Board of Regents’ meeting: ombudsman for dispute resolution on each UT System component, nursing shortage and nursing faculty issues at health components, system-wide data base for faculty and student research background/interests, and fund set-aside for fundable but unfunded grant proposals.
Jeffrey Phelps.
Phelps presented information on a revision of the funding
formulas for higher education. These new
formulas try to capture the total cost for teaching. After
reviewing several tables of formula-related information, he offered some
observations on legislative priorities.
As funding for Medicaid increases, funding for higher education
decreases. The
Geri Malandra, Vice Chancellor for Accountability
There are differences between the Coordinating Board and the UT System over accountability measures. The audience for the accountability reports is the Texas Legislature.
FAC Committee Reports
Quality: Resolution: Whereas graduate education at the doctoral level involves teaching and research faculty as well as administrators and whereas teaching and research faculty are primary responsible for the creation and implementation of the curricula for doctoral programs, the FAC recommends that the UT System nominate non-administrative teaching and research faculty to serve on the Coordinating Board’s Graduate Advisory Policy Committee.
Governance: Definition of “Non-administrative faculty”: teaching, research, and clinical faculty below the level of chair, with the exception of term-limited, rotating chairs.
Academic Affairs: Investigate pattern of submission and approval of post-graduate programs by the Coordinating Board.
VI. Academic Standards and Student
Records Committee Report
Mr. Welther, Chair of the Academic Standards and Student Records Committee, provided the Senate with the following report. Mr. Welther reported that this committee has been looking at the suspension and probation policies on campus. Mr. Welther reported that in terms of suspension and probation- there are two policies- one involving academics and one in connection with financial aid. Mr. Welther explained that when students must stop out because of financial aid suspension, they go to the Business Office and apply for an emergency loan, because while they may be on financial aid suspension, they may not be on academic suspension. Mr. Welther further explained that once students lose financial aid, they are in a financial spiral because they apply for loans that they can’t repay. Mr. Welther said he has asked the Registrar to look at how many students have below a 2.0 GPA. Mr. Welther also said his committee is looking at whether financial aid suspension and academic suspension should be tied together. Mr. Welther concluded his report by saying that the committee needs to look at more data- maybe two semesters worth of data to make a recommendation. Ms. Cantu thanked Mr. Welther for his report.
VII. Evaluation of Administrators/Level of
Confidence Question
Ms. Cantu reported that this was issue raised by Dr. Davis (who could not attend this meeting) who wanted a question put on administrators’ evaluations regarding their leadership ability and the level of confidence faculty had in their leadership. Dr. Davis via Ms. Cantu suggested the following statement be added to administrators’ evaluations:
Overall I rate the
leadership of this person as….
Several Senate members objected to this statement, saying that it
doesn’t fit on the Likert Scale (strongly agree…). Dr. Boze suggested that the statement be
changed to I have confidence in this
person’s leadership.
Mr. Cortina moved that this statement be added to administrators’ evaluations. Mr. Welther seconded the motion. The motion passed.
VIII. HOOP Policy 7.3.1- “Faculty
Responsibilities and Workload”
Mr. Phillips presented HOOP Policy 7.3.1- “Faculty Responsibilities and Workload” to the Senate for a first read. Mr. Phillips explained that basically the changes to the policy occurred in Section E where the policy describes the changes in the workload procedure. Under the revised policy, the department chair will meet with all probationary and tenured faculty in an annual workload planning conference to determine the faculty member’s instructional workload and mix of other responsibilities for the coming year and review the accomplishments of the preceding year. A faculty workload plan detailing the faculty member’s instructional workload and mix of responsibilities for the coming year shall be developed as a result of the annual planning conference. Probationary faculty members will continue to meet with the department chair and dean to discuss the faculty member’s instructional workload and mix of other responsibilities for the coming year and review the accomplishments of the preceding year. Tenured faculty members may meet with the department chair and dean to discuss the faculty member’s instructional workload and mix of responsibilities for the coming year and review the accomplishments of the preceding year. This meeting is optional, but shall occur upon the request of the faculty member, the Chair or the Dean.
Following a brief discussion, Dr. Otero moved to approve first reading of this policy. Dr. Hollier seconded the motion and the motion carried. This policy will appear before the Senate for a second read.
IX. New Business
There were three items of “New Business”.
Ms. Cantu said that she will put this item on the agenda for a future meeting.
X. Provost’s Report
Dr. Martin had eight items in his report.
Her leadership allowed us to play a vital role in the Telecampus MBA, which allowed campus colleagues like Dr. Lackey and Mr. Zavaletta to reach hundreds of students outside of our region. I also want to mention that no one has fought harder for higher salaries for the faculty than Dr. Boze
Dr. Boze’s decision is based on family reasons, and we wish to express our best wishes to her. She will return to teaching in September.
Dr. Eli Pena has announced his decision to step down as Director of Advising, and will return to teaching. It is hard to formulate in a few words, how much we all owe to Dr. Pena, the workload of his department, and his own superhuman efforts. We can all rest a bit easier today because he and his staff are still trying to address all the challenges that surface as we prepare for graduation. For both Dr. Boze and Dr. Pena we expect great things, and I know I foresee the future when I state that, from Dr. Boze and Dr. Pena, the best is yet to come.
XI. Announcements
There were two announcements.
· The General Faculty Meeting will be from 11-12:30 on Wednesday, January 12 in the SETB Lecture Hall. On the agenda will be a report from the Welfare Committee on salaries, a discussion on the election of department chairs, and a discussion on recognition of tenure, promotion, and exceptional merit. Please encourage faculty members to attend this meeting.
·
The next Academic Senate meeting is at
XII. Adjournment
The meeting stood adjourned at
Respectfully submitted,
Julie Ann Larson
Academic Senate Secretary