The
Academic Senate Minutes
I. Call to Order
Ms. Cantu called the
Members of the Senate in attendance included: Mr. Steve Benton (s), Dr. Betsy Boze, Ms. Ethel Cantu (*). Mr. Roberto Cortina (s), Dr. Charles Dameron, Dr. William C. Davis (s), Mr. Doug Ferrier, Ms. Linda Fossen, Mr. Victor Fuhro, Dr. Therese Gallegos (s), Ms. Mabel Hockaday (s), Dr. Gerald Hollier (s), Dr. Edward Hymson (*), Mr. Joe Lacher (s), Dr. Charles Lackey, Ms. Julie Larson (*), Dr. Jose Martin, Mr. Domingo Molina (s), Ms. Kim Morris- Garcia (substituting for Mr. Mahandran Rajasurian {s}), Dr. Eldon Nelson, Dr. Rafael Otero (s), Dr. Gerson Peltz (s), Ms. Cheryl Phelps (s), Mr. Jay Phillips, Dr. Ruth Ann Ragland, Dr. Rey Ramirez (s), Dr. Renee Rubin (s), Dr. Carl Stockton, Dr. John Sutterby (s), and Mr. Tom Welther (*).
II. Review and Approval of the Minutes
from the
Senate Meeting
Ms. Cantu called for review of the minutes from the
III. Presentation and Discussion: Faculty Memorials
Ms. Cantu invited Dr. Bill Strong, Vice President for Institutional Advancement (VPIA), to address the Senate regarding faculty memorials.
Dr. Strong said that for years a plan has been in place to create an area on campus designated for a faculty memorial. He said he contacted architects and landscapers about the creation of an area designated for a faculty memorial. Dr. Strong said that such an area would cost the university approximately $180,000. Dr. Strong said the university does not have the money to build such an area and that if such a project would be constructed it would have to use outside funding.
Dr. Strong said that in the past trees were planted around the campus in remembrance of a deceased faculty member but he said that plaques were never placed on the trees so over the years people have forgotten what tree belongs to what person. Dr. Strong also noted that on page 42 of the Master Plan, an area has been devoted to a faculty memorial. Once again, Dr. Strong said, the cost to the university of such a designated area would be costly.
Dr. Martin responded that he acknowledges that the value of a faculty memorial would be enormous but he also said that the university sad been pinching every penny in order to meet its budget. He said a faculty memorial could not be built for under $100,000. He said that right now faculty salaries are a top priority. He, too, noted that a faculty memorial is included in the Master Plan.
Dr. Nelson asked if we could tax ourselves to create a memorial. Dr. Hymson asked about the value. Dr. Gallegos suggested that the university take up a collection. Dr. Davis had three suggestions: a memorial grove, brass plaques on benches around the campus, and contributions to scholarships in the deceased faculty’s name. Mr. Ferrier suggested that donations could be made to the library to purchase books in the deceased’s name. Mr. Molina suggested that the deceased faculty member be remembered in their department, college, or school with a picture or portrait. Dr. Martin said that there are many ways to remember loved ones and there is certainly a case to be made for creating a permanent memorial. He said that the university doesn’t have the funds to produce a permanent memorial.
Dr. Hymson moved that we adopt a fund to receive voluntary contributions towards a memorial fund for deceased faculty, staff, and administrators and that whatever memorial fund we come up with come from voluntary contributions and not from university funds. Ms. Phelps seconded the motion. The motion carried.
Dr. Hollier suggested that we need a committee to spearhead this initiative. Dr. Hymson then moved that we establish a committee, headed by Mr. Steve Benton, to recommend to the administration how to establish a memorial fund for deceased faculty, staff, and administrators. Dr. Peltz seconded the motion. The motion carried.
IV. Senate President’s Report
Ms. Cantu had three items in her report.
1. Increase faculty salaries.
2. Elect department chairs to terms of three years.
3. Implement secure parking areas for faculty near classrooms/office buildings and require proof of insurance fro all parking permits.
4. Increase hires of master’s degreed tenure-track faculty at technical rank to teach lower division coursed.
5. Provide guidance for Personnel Committees.
6. Incorporate summer teaching as part of workload to allow flexible scheduling.
Faculty also requested information or clarification about the following topics;
1. What
are the guidelines from the State of
absences?
2. How are the formulas for salary comparisons to peer institutions by
department and field derived?
We also welcome Emir Jose Macari, the new Dean of Science, Math and Technology.
Ms. Cantu, in her report, also read the aforementioned letter from President Garcia. Ms. Cantu said that this letter and her meeting with Dr. Garcia speak well of the communication between Dr. Garcia and the Academic Senate via Ms. Cantu.
V. Partnership Committee Reports
A. Business
B. Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Committee- no report.
VI. Appointments to Academic Budget and
Finance Review Committee
Ms. Cantu reported that the Academic Budget and Finance Review Committee, which is a technical committee, has three members whose terms expire in September, 2004. Ms. Cantu said the three out-going committee members include: Sessica Wyche, Carol Collinsworth, and David Pearson. Ms. Cantu said she has received the names of three nominees to fill the vacancies and in consultation with the Executive Committee of the Academic Senate brought the three names to the Senate for its approval. Ms. Cantu said the nominees are: Domingo Molina, Rafael Otero, and Bobbette Morgan. Ms. Cantu said that these nominees, if approved, would serve a two-year term (from September 2004 to September 2006). Dr. Davis moved to accept the nominations brought forward by the Senate President and Mr. Welther seconded the motion. The motion carried. Ms. Cantu will forward the list of names to Vice President of Business Affairs Rosemary Martinez.
VII. Discussion: Issues
and Concerns Raised by Faculty at the General Faculty Meeting
Ms. Cantu reported that the
General Faculty Meeting was held on
The following discussion took place in the Senate regarding each issue.
Mr. Welther brought up the issue of proof of insurance for all permit holders. He wondered if we currently require proof of insurance in order to get a parking permit. Dr. Hymson said no and added that it would be very difficult to enforce a mandatory proof of insurance policy. Dr. Boze commented that the stickers can be easily removed and transferred from one car to another, thus making the policy difficult to enforce. Dr. Davis suggested that the Senate refer this issue to the Parking Committee. Mr. Welther moved that all permit holders provide proof of insurance at the time of permit pick-up and that this issue be referred to the Parking Committee to further work out the details of how to implement this requirement. Mr. Cortina seconded the motion and the motion carried.
Ms. Phelps brought up the issue of secured parking. Ms. Phelps, with a friendly amendment from Dr. Hymson, moved that any lots designated for faculty be secure by gates or other means of enforcement to provide security. Dr. Hymson seconded the motion and the motion carried. This was a ‘sense of the Senate” motion.
· Increase hires of master’s degreed tenure-track faculty at technical rank to teach lower division courses- Dr. Gallegos explained this issue to the Senate by saying that it makes sense to convert some lecturer lines to technical track to that these faculty members could teach lower division classed. Dr. Gallegos said this would be very helpful in departments like English and Math. Ms. Cantu suggested that the Senate take action on this issue at another Senate meeting. Senators agreed to that suggestion.
· Provide guidance for personnel committees- Dr. Sutterby explained this issue to the Senate by saying that personnel committees on campus are proceeding without any guidance or instructions on how they should operate. Ms. Cantu said that this issue was brought up in the General Faculty Meeting by Dr. Rivas, who serves as the Senate Ombudsman in response to several complaints she has heard. Ms. Morris-Garcia said that sometimes grievances or complaints would be avoided if the personnel committees had guidelines to follow. Dr. Hymson moved that this issue be referred to an appropriate committee as determined by the Senate President. Mr. Welther seconded the motion and the motion carried. Ms. Cantu will refer this issue to the appropriate committee.
·
Incorporate summer teaching as part of
workload to allow flexible scheduling- Dr. Rubin explained this issue to
the Senate by saying that some faculty are interested in teaching a
nontraditional load- summer/fall or summer/spring. She said teaching a nontraditional load would
allow departments to offer more classes in the summer, especially in the
VIII. New Business
There was one item of “New Business”.
IX. Provost’s Report
Dr. Martin had seven items in his report.
X. Announcements
Ms. Cantu had three announcements:
VI. Adjournment
The meeting stood adjourned at
Respectfully submitted,
Julie Ann Larson, Academic Senate Secretary